From Cautious to Converted
This project, stage 2 in a 3 year study in conjunction with Monash University and sponsor, Hudson RPO, is a response to the unprecedented level of global activity and investment in AI occurring within Australia and globally.
In 2022, for this second phase, we mapped the state-of-play of AI-supported recruitment in Australia by surveying 458 Australian-based recruiters and job applicants.
DCA Members can log in to access the full report in the member-only section below.
The research found that:
1 in 3
Employer implementation of AI is in early stages, with 1 in 3 Australian organisations reporting that they used it recently.
However, understanding how often applicants have experienced AI in recruitment is difficult, as applicants are often not aware that AI is being used.
Share an infographic of the findings
Download and share this overview of the current state-of-play of AI in recruitment in Australian workplaces.
The research also found that experiences with, and attitudes about, AI-supported recruitment fell very clearly into one of two camps, the converted or the cautious.
The ‘cautious’ question AI use in recruitment, the ‘converted’ are positive about the impact of AI in recruitment
- The cautious were less likely to have experienced AI in recruitment and more likely to have no or only poor knowledge in the area. They believed AI tools: focus on efficiency at the expense of effectiveness; lack nuance in decision making, depersonalise the candidate experience; have a negative impact on diversity and inclusion; are often inaccessible; and can amplify bias.
- The converted were more likely to have experienced AI in recruitment and to have great or good knowledge in the area. They believed AI tools: provide flexibility for all parties; help cast a wider sourcing net; could eliminate bias in recruitment; and can be more objective, consistent, and predictable than people.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander applicants and white job applicants are more likely to be cautious, while Asian and Black job applicants are more likely to be converted.
DCA CEO, Lisa Annese said:
“This project comes amidst the unprecedented level of global activity and investment in AI occurring within Australia and globally. The divide between the cautious and converted in this report shows that we need to do more to educate employers about the promises and pitfalls of AI-based recruitment and selection technologies for workplace diversity and inclusion.”
Materials in this document are © Diversity Council Australia Limited, 2022 and come under our Terms of Use and Privacy Statement.
If you wish to use any content in this report, please contact us at research@dca.org.au to seek consent.
Where you refer to our research publicly, you must correctly attribute it to DCA.
We require formal attribution for all written references to our research material. Citing DCA as a source will suffice where the reference is verbal.
To request an accessible alternative format of any document, please email admin@dca.org.au. Please let us know which format you need and for which document. While DCA will do its best to provide you with the alternative you need, please be aware that not all formats may be available.
Member-only content
Gain full access with DCA membership!
If your organisation has just signed up, your access will be activated as soon as payment is received.